Fred and all,
Do I read you correctly, it stating a fact it is necessary for you
to use a threatening remark in response? I believe this does not
meet the guidelines for the IETF as well or this list.
No I was not if you read my post closely, making any ad hominem remark,
rather mearly stating what has been well known from Mr. Shaws
remarks in the past or other lists as a point of clarity. By definition
that is NOT an ad hominem remark.... >;)
Fred Baker wrote:
> At 02:50 PM 3/8/99 +0000, Jeff Williams wrote:
> > You sometimes must excuse Robert Shaws attitudes in some areas.
> >He is well known for his dictatorial tendencies, his comment/question
> >is just one of many displays of those dictatorial leanings. The thought of
> >independent thought is abhorrent to him if it differs from his own.
>
> This comment doesn't fit the guidelines of the IETF or POISED list, and by
> the way is an ad hominem remark. Bob's in the penalty box for ignoring the
> subject matter of the list (and comments about same from all over, not just
> myself) and for ad hominem remarks. Don't make me make the point with you
> as well.
kindest regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
