Esther, The CIX, Euro_ISPA, and the Latin American consortium of ISP Associations submitted an address supporting organization application on feb 5. Why did it not go on the ICANN web as a supporting organization application? Then when the ISP associations made a stink about it at the Singapore meeting you told them belatedly it would go in its proper place on the ICANN web. You were reportedly angry that it had been miss handled. Yet it is now on your web in its proper place but with the following very strange disclaimer: ICANN Supporting Organization Applications and Comments IMPORTANT NOTICE - This document is only an application for recognition as a Supporting Organization. It is NOT authoritative and are NOT to be relied on by any party. http://www.icann.org/aso/aso-app.rtf Ester why was the disclaimer added? Why is it not authoritative? The ISP associationsa involved all blieved that they followed your process instructions, yet their effort appears to have been wasted. Why? *************************************************************************** The COOK Report on Internet | New handbook just published:IP Insur- 431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618 USA| gency & Transformation of Telecomm.See (609) 882-2572 (phone & fax) | http://cookreport.com/insurgency.html [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Index to 7 years of COOK Report, how to subscribe, exec summaries, special reports, gloss at http://www.cookreport.com ******************************************************************************
