>> In this case, since the DNSO.org is allowing INTA to determine the
bylaws,
>
>You are misinformed.
>
>[erroneous conclusions deleted]
>
>> This is exactly what is happening here.  One special interest group is
>> going to dictate the "rules"
>
>No, it's not.


Unfortunately, direct observation seems to be in contradiction from your
statements. On one side we have what can be read as drafted, an on
the other, we have Kent Crispin's word-for-it.

Sorry, Kent, I'm sure you're a fine human being, but I'm not going
to just take your word for it.

Christopher


__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________

Reply via email to