At 12:43 PM 3/23/99 -0500, you wrote: >Actually, the USG now has the trademark. Ah, so! Now, inasmuch as trademarks cannot exist in a vacuum but only in association with the corresponding goods and/or services -- if you're not a trademark attorney kindly don't argue that point -- are you saying that the USG also owns those goods and/or services? In that case, would not an edit on the Internic site that automatically directs everyone to NSI constitute a theft of government services? I mean, not to ask embarrassing questions here, but really? Bill Lovell
