Ivan, 

In the interest of full disclosure to the Internet
community are you willing to disclose your 
repeated failed attempts to sell your company to 
Network Solutions?

Chris Clough
Network Solutions

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ivan Pope [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, March 25, 1999 1:40 PM
> To:   '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject:      [IFWP] NSI purposely disseminated misleading information
> 
> As far as I can see, the InterNIC site was where NSI fulfilled their
> duties
> to the USG and the networksolutions.com site was where they offered a
> value
> added service. 
> It is of course entirely self serving that NSI now claims the InterNIC
> site
> as a Registrar site rather than a Registry site. Well, of course they
> would,
> but the USG shouldn't let them get away with it.
> Every time NSI claims an absolute truth, you need to look at the spin and
> the re-writing of history.
> 
> And read http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/990325/ny_asensio_1.html for
> background. 
> I quote 'We believe that NSOL's management has purposely disseminated
> misleading information, and failed to disclose material negative
> information'. 
> 
> Ivan
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, March 25, 1999 1:09 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [IFWP] FYI
> > 
> > 
> > I know many refuse to accept this, but the old InterNIC was
> > a hybrid site involving both registry (DNS) and registrar
> > (customer) functions and it is very easy to establish that
> > most of the functions on the InterNIC site were registrar
> > related.  InterNIC was not a registry.  There was no
> > registry, but there will be shortly.
> > 
> > Chuck
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: John B. Reynolds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 1999 11:46 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [IFWP] FYI
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > A.M. Rutkowski wrote:
> > >
> > > At 05:44 PM 3/24/99 , John B. Reynolds wrote:
> > > >The old InterNIC site is still up (presumably maintained
> > in case NSI is
> > > >forced to pull down the new one):  It's at
> > http://198.41.0.5/ or
> > > >http://rs0.internic.net/.
> > >
> > > It actually looks like the site for the new registry
> > > home page, doesn't it?
> > >
> > >
> > > --tony
> > >
> > 
> > If that were the case, it would be appropriate for
> > http://www.internic.net
> > and http://rs.internic.net to continue to point to it, since
> > InterNIC is the
> > registry (the registrar is WorldNIC).
> > 
> > ________________________________________________________
> > NetZero - We believe in a FREE Internet.  Shouldn't you?
> > Get your FREE Internet Access and Email at
> > http://www.netzero.net/download.html
> > 

Reply via email to