So Chris,
If the dealings were confidential, how much am I now allowed to disclose?
Am I allowed to disclose discussions with Bob, Gabe and Don which were, to
say the least, surprising to me at the time?
Am I allowed to disclose a document that Bob sent to me?
Am I allowed to disclose discussions I had with your bankers Paine Webber?
How far does this go?
Ivan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Clough, Christopher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, March 26, 1999 1:08 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: [IFWP] (asensio) purposely disseminated misleading
> informatio n
>
>
> > Is it the job of the spokesperson to set forth the truth or
> attack the
> > critic?
> Set forth the truth and illuminate the darkness.
>
> > Were Mr. Pope's dealings confidential?
> Yes.
>
> > Will NSI now disclose all
> > its confidential business dealings?
> see above
> > Has NSI had any contacts with Thomson
> > and Thomson recently?
> not recently
> > I noticed that they were running creation date info
> > about two weeks after you removed it, and then they
> suddenly stopped.
> > Did NSI in any way cause T&T to pull the creation date info?
> Judicious move by T&T
>
> > At 02:21 PM 3/25/99 -0500, you wrote:
> > >Ivan,
> > >
> > >In the interest of full disclosure to the Internet
> > >community are you willing to disclose your
> > >repeated failed attempts to sell your company to
> > >Network Solutions?
> > >
> > >Chris Clough
> > >Network Solutions
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Ivan Pope [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > >> Sent: Thursday, March 25, 1999 1:40 PM
> > >> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > >> Subject: [IFWP] NSI purposely disseminated misleading information
> > >>
> > >> As far as I can see, the InterNIC site was where NSI
> fulfilled their
> > >> duties
> > >> to the USG and the networksolutions.com site was where
> they offered a
> > >> value
> > >> added service.
> > >> It is of course entirely self serving that NSI now
> claims the InterNIC
> > >> site
> > >> as a Registrar site rather than a Registry site. Well,
> of course they
> > >> would,
> > >> but the USG shouldn't let them get away with it.
> > >> Every time NSI claims an absolute truth, you need to
> look at the spin
> > and
> > >> the re-writing of history.
> > >>
> > >> And read http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/990325/ny_asensio_1.html for
> > >> background.
> > >> I quote 'We believe that NSOL's management has purposely
> disseminated
> > >> misleading information, and failed to disclose material negative
> > >> information'.
> > >>
> > >> Ivan
> > >>
> > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > >> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > >> > Sent: Thursday, March 25, 1999 1:09 PM
> > >> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> > Subject: RE: [IFWP] FYI
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > I know many refuse to accept this, but the old InterNIC was
> > >> > a hybrid site involving both registry (DNS) and registrar
> > >> > (customer) functions and it is very easy to establish that
> > >> > most of the functions on the InterNIC site were registrar
> > >> > related. InterNIC was not a registry. There was no
> > >> > registry, but there will be shortly.
> > >> >
> > >> > Chuck
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > >> > From: John B. Reynolds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > >> > Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 1999 11:46 PM
> > >> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> > Subject: RE: [IFWP] FYI
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > A.M. Rutkowski wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > At 05:44 PM 3/24/99 , John B. Reynolds wrote:
> > >> > > >The old InterNIC site is still up (presumably maintained
> > >> > in case NSI is
> > >> > > >forced to pull down the new one): It's at
> > >> > http://198.41.0.5/ or
> > >> > > >http://rs0.internic.net/.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > It actually looks like the site for the new registry
> > >> > > home page, doesn't it?
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > --tony
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> > If that were the case, it would be appropriate for
> > >> > http://www.internic.net
> > >> > and http://rs.internic.net to continue to point to it, since
> > >> > InterNIC is the
> > >> > registry (the registrar is WorldNIC).
> > >> >
> > >> > ________________________________________________________
> > >> > NetZero - We believe in a FREE Internet. Shouldn't you?
> > >> > Get your FREE Internet Access and Email at
> > >> > http://www.netzero.net/download.html
> > >> >
> > >
> > >
>
