hello chris there appears to be some real inconsistancies in your statment here... where is and what are the "significant risks" you mention ? according to documents filed in conjunction with the recent sec S-3 filing dated 1/4/99 relating to the stock sale by SAIC & key officers of NSI (i quote from page 52) "Although 41 of these objections have resulted in litigation involving the Company, as of December 31, 1997, NO DAMAGES HAVE BEEN AWARDED AGAINST THE COMPANY to any plaintiff in the 36 cases that have been resolved. The Company believes that it has meritorious defenses and intends to vigorously defend itself against these claims." maybe i missed an amended filing to reflect the "significant risk to the company" you mentioned.. if so... please redirect me to this amended filing... if not... then please explain this inconsistancy .. best wishes ken stubbs ----- Original Message ----- From: Clough, Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 25, 1999 8:48 PM Subject: [IFWP] RE: Asensio subject of 9 lawsuits (was RE: Asensio attack: ([IFWP ] NSI purposely disseminated misleading information)) >The number is 56. At significant cost and risk >to the company. > >Carl you'll recall this: > >Cases 97N1496 and 97N2456, >Oppedahl and Larson >v. Network Solutions >Motion hearing and trial preparation >conference (June 4, 1998) Denver, Colo. > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Carl Oppedahl [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Thursday, March 25, 1999 7:58 PM >> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: Asensio subject of 9 lawsuits (was RE: Asensio attack: >> ([IFWP] NSI purposely disseminated misleading information)) >> >> At 03:12 PM 3/25/99 , Clough, Christopher wrote: >> >> >Asensio subject of 9 lawsuits: >> >> NSI is and has been the subject of far more than nine lawsuits, in case >> anybody has forgotten. >> >
