Ronda Hauben wrote:
> So the U.S. government is setting up a body that *no* membership
> or any other forms could check and oversee. To put such
> fabulously rich public property as the domain names, the IP
> numbers, the protocols etc into the hands of a private entity
> under any condition is only an invitation for corruption,
> conflict of interest and massive theft.

 In these circumstances not even the most 
 rigorous and open of membership structures
 will prevent massive abuse. This, combined
 with all of the other errors in compound
 that are known as ICANN inded sets up a
 more or less permanently exploitative
 body apparently set to occupy the entire
 governance of the Internet. Which pretty
 much renders this medium nul and void in
 the long term as an appropriate vehicle of
 open, free and public communications.

 Now on to a potential solution. Merely
 fighting for the dominance of good people
 or factions within a basically unfair
 hierarchical structure inevitably leads
 to the same cul de sac when those same
 folks are either compromised or pass out
 of power. So the struggle within the
 framework is doomed I'm afraid. Even trying
 to set up a parrallel or competing "good"
 hierarchy leads to the same slippery slope
 sort of slide. What then?

 We will have to resort to some solution
 that does *not* depend upon central authority
 and a "hierarchy scales" solution. Some route
 around and clever series of constructs that
 allows every citizen, community group,
 political party, company or what have you,
 an address, identity and localization 
 minus all of the scrabbling for power and
 sheer craven profiteering. It is my opinion
 that this is far more easily accomplished
 by "dumbing down" the network rather than
 the current motion towards smarting it up.
 
 The whole idea is to simply plug and play.
 Removed from all of the tables and approvals,
 fees and master lists, bottlenecks and penny
 ante dictatorships. Plug it in and go. No
 more applying for this or allowing 24 hours
 of propagation time for that. Instant and
 universal connectivity without undue difficulty,
 hienous surviellance mechanisms or complex
 network architectures prone to catastrophic
 failure. How this will be achieved seems to
 be a matter of determination and ingenuity.
 Which is in abundant supply down here even
 if it rather scarce in the hallowed virtual
 halls of the high and bloody mighty "Internet
 Community". Do-able? Yessirrree Ma'am!

 Bob Allisat

 Free Community Network _ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://fcn.net _ http://fcn.net/allisat
 http://robin.fcn.net

Reply via email to