Roeland Meyer writes:
> I do not think we are in radical disagreement here. You do what 
> you want with your space and I'll do what I want with mine. 
> However, if someone wants to play in my space then they do so on 
> my terms. If I build a large space, on my efforts, and a lot of 
> people want to pay to play then it is my benefit and my reward for 
> building the space. If others want to help me build my space 
> better/larger/cheaper then I can accept that help, on *my* terms, 
> and it still remains *my* space, just as your space remains your
> space. We both feel that anyone trying to tell us what we can do, 
> with our respective spaces, can go PUAR.

 The relationship between Numbering and addressing
 as well as the specific nature of the address itself
 has been artificially and unecessarily restricted.
 Numbers can be generated in infinite sequences with
 no limitation. Likewise naming schemes. My point is
 that no one person or entity can control or somehow
 hedge vast quanities of the character set, whether
 numerically or alphabetically speaking, for profit
 or simply from IAHC/ICANN/ARIN-like spite. And every
 proposal on the table attempts to do just that in
 one form or another. Thus the requirement to route
 around any obstructions.

 Numbers should be spit out without limitation. No
 scarcity is possible in this regard. And charchter
 sets should be dispensed in an equal spirit. We are
 shackled and crippled by a mode of thought that is 
 outmoded. Our constance referance to the "YOURNAME.TLD"
 delegation, registrar/registry, application, fees and
 so on model is archaic. We can be free to choose *any*
 format and it would not be much of a problem for modern
 software and machines to deal with the outcome. In fact 
 exponentially increasing complexity is just what new
 capabilites allow us to envisage. In that regard maybe
 we are not that far apart. Heck you can have the
 damned silly legacy structure. Personally I think it's
 inefficient and rather ridiculous. I favour complete,
 ground up innovation. A number associated with a set
 of characters minus all the bullshif. To get to me
 just enter...

 Bob Allisat

 Free Community Network ... [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ http://fcn.net

Reply via email to