Mark Jeftovic writes: = Minimum requirements mean the entity means business and are serious, = and can be taken seriously. Grass roots activists get bored easily = and move from one lofty ideal to the next. Kevin M. Kelly replies: > While I completely agree that minimum requirement are a necessity for > registrars, I can't help but think you're being a bit too critical of > Bob and FCN. First, I think he has the same "lofty ideal" that he had > when he got involved in FCN--it has just become evident that FCN is not > the answer. Furthermore, judging from what Bob has said on the list, I > believe that we can all rest assured than all of the current FCN > registrant will be transitioned seamlessly. FCN will respect all currently resolving registrations and work with the parties concerned to find acceptable solutions where-ever possible. Domains that are inactive, contain out of date or inaccurate contact information or are otherwise defunct will be deleted. Not only is the current DNS *not* a solution it is the very source of many of our problems. The only alternative from our perspective is to end *all* support for what we see as a regressive and oppressive institution. We are not cops nor do we wise to be judge and jury over anyone's future, club, school or personal existance. Thanks for this fraction of space on your collective screens. Bob Allisat Free Community Network ... [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ http://fcn.net
