All,

Brian E Carpenter wrote:

> Poisson,
>
> There was only one suggested change to this, which I have added
> below. Do we want to re-issue 2282, or merely keep this on hold
> until there is another reason to re-issue it?
>
> Section 4 of RFC 2282 states among other things
>
> > >   (9)   Nominating committee members must not be nominees.
> > >
> > >         To be a nominee is to enter the process of being selected as a
> > >         candidate and confirmed.  Nominating committee members are not
> > >         eligible to be considered for filling any open position.
>
> I would like to suggest adding a sentence to this clause as follows:
>
>           This ineligibility starts from the moment that the
>           membership of the nominating committee is announced,
>           and continues until the membership of the next nominating
>           committee is announced, even for a member who resigns
>           from the committee.

  I would recommend the following modification:

That no member of the nominating committee may be a nominee.
That the nominating committee must be elected by majority vote of
the general assembly through online or attendance voting .  That any
and all nominee's must be approved by the General assembly by
majority vote through online or attendance vote.
That any and all stakeholders are to be considered members or are
eligible for membership of the PSO in accordance with the requirements
of the white paper...

>
>
>     Brian Carpenter

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact Number:  972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208

Reply via email to