Tony harris directed our attention to the Oppenhiemer piece in the Miami Herald >From oppenheimer's article: > >Reached at his temporary office in northern California, ICANN president >Michael Roberts told me he was fully aware of the Latin American >complaints. He suggested that the group's board was put together in a hurry >-- like most things in the frantic world of the Internet -- and that in >accordance to its bylaws, it's bound to be completed with members >representing all regions. > > ``I didn't have anything to do with that,'' Roberts said, >referring to the first appointments. ``But in my conversations with the >directors after they hired me at the end of October, it's clear that there >is a genuine desire to have the board represent a diverse variety of >geographic interests.'' > I responded: COOK: the hell roberts had nothing to do with it. (the board appointments) Cook again: after some private corresponce just now I went back to my December cook report article and extracted the following on record quote from Mike when I told him (Mike) privately along with the other members who worked with SIMs and Jon postel to put ICANN together. This response to me interestingly enough came on October 14th before Mike was announced as ICANN president...."drafted" for the presidency by the board that he helped to select. Mike Roberts October 14th response: "Gordon - it is no secret that I have represented EDUCAUSE and its members over the course of the summer in matters related to the white paper. I helped organize and fund IFWP and participated in its Steering Committee as long as that was useful. I moderated a panel in Geneva, I drafted policy positions for EDUCAUSE management, ***I have had dozens and dozens of bilateral and multilateral conversations about every aspect of the topic, including conversations about the desirable characteristics of Board members, interim and permanent, and who might fulfill those characteristics best.*** If that makes me guilty as charged, then I plead guilty." COOK: I have added the *** *** to the above passage. The matter is fundamental. After Jock Gill compalined to Vint cerf that the ICANN board was a virgin birth from an as yet undeclared god head, Vint made some polite disclaimers and reassured Jock that he and others should TRUST Mike Roberts, Esther Dyson, and the ICANN Board. Not to long there after Steve Wolff came out and said that *HE* didn't trust the ICANN board but that he would if it could find it acceptable to run open meetings according to the federal advisory councils requirements. To date Roberts and Dyson have done nothing to respond to these concerns. saying Jon postel picked this board is a cop out.... jon unfortunately is gone and there is a lot that has happened since his passing like for example the november 21st modification of article four of the ICANN articles of incorporation that has never beeen publicly discussed. I am inclined to conclude that if Roberts or Dyson or any of the five or Cochetti could justify their decisions in a mail list subject to the ORSC rules of civil discourse, they ICANN the internet would benefit from their doing so. Imperiously they choose not to... I DRAW MY OWN conclusions from that action. > >>Dear friends of the IFWP process, >> >>Our claims for regional representation in ICANN may go unanswered, but >>they dont go unnoticed. >>For anyone interested may I suggest you go to < www.herald.com > bottom of >>the front page and open >>the Oppenheimer report. >> >>To read it in Spanish go to < www.elherald.com > >> >>Regards >> >>Tony Harris >>CABASE - Argentina >> *************************************************************************** The COOK Report on Internet What Happened to the White Paper? 431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618 USA ICANN a Sham. (updated 10/25/98) See (609) 882-2572 (phone & fax) http://www.cookreport.com/whorules.html [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index to 6 years of COOK Report, how to subscribe, exec summaries, special reports, gloss at http://www.cookreport.com *************************************************************************** __________________________________________________ To receive the digest version instead, send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___END____________________________________________
