Richard and all,
Good point here Richard. We wondered if the NTIA or the ICANN can
really seriously consider the DNSO.ORG's proposal seriously considering
the already well known circumstances that has tainted DNSO.ORG's
effort from the very beginning. Shades of the IAHC/gTLD-MoU maybe???
Richard J. Sexton wrote:
> INTA as the DNSO ? Is it April 1 already ?
>
> Fair play though, if we let INTA be the DNSO can we
> let DNS administrators be the Intellectual Property
> regulatory body ? The we could eliminate the
> onerous taxes on black cassette tapes, DAT's
> and CD's posts haste. Fair is fair.
>
> One good thing that might come of INTA being the
> DNSO though, it would really hasten the development
> of the replacment for DNS, whatever it might be,
> and you be sure INTA would have no place to hang their
> hat there by design.
>
> Just out of curiosity, how many INTA members know
> to to configure a nameserver ?
>
> --
> "To find out what your opponent is up to, look at what he
> says about you" - unknown
>
> --
> DOMAIN-POLICY administrivia should be sent to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To unsubscribe send a message with only one line "SIGNOFF DOMAIN-POLICY"
> For more help regarding Listserv commands send the one line "HELP"
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
