Kent Crispin wrote:

> [Gobbledygook not susceptible to cross-posting, to the effect that Michael Sondow 
>doesn't appreciate the > ICC's comments for their true value, and delivered in the 
>pedantic tones of one, Mr. Kent Crispin, above the > level of mere mortals]

Hmmm. I guess this is some sort of "instruction" that you're giving me, eh,
Kent? It's been a long time since I was instructed in how to behave. At the
age of fifty-five, it's a little unusual to be receiving instruction,
especially from someone about fifteen years my junior, less well-educated
than myself, less experienced in the world, and whose comments on these
lists don't reflect any particularly noteworthy intelligence or
perspicacity.

But I suppose your position as - what? the "editor" of the DNSO.org drafts?
- puts you in a position to be instructing others in how to read the
obnoxious proposals of the ICC. Thanks for your help. Now I see clearly that
the ICC's exclusion of individuals, including myself, from their DNSO is a
"thoughtful and considered comment likely to lead to productive debate and a
polite and agreeable compromise". Is that right, Kent?

Fine. Then I won't protest further. I merely present the following:

ICIIU Proposal for Membership Criteria in the DNSO

DNSO membership is open to any person who is the registrant of a second
level domain name under the generic TLDs, or of a third level domain name
under a ccTLD whose second level domains are generic; or any person directly
delegated to represent such a person.

I think that's a thoughtful and considered comment likely to lead to
productive debate and a polite and agreeable compromise, too. Don't you?
Please add it to the DNSO merger draft. Thanks.

__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________

Reply via email to