William X. Walsh a �crit:
>
> On 16-Jan-99 Michael Sondow wrote:
> >
> > As to the myself and the ICIIU, now that the NSI has come out in favor of
> > broad participation I suggest that they simply use the entire
> > .com/.org./.edu second-level domain database as a distribution list, and
> > send the various DNSO bylaws proposals to everyone for selection. Those that
> > get the most votes are used in the application to ICANN. In my opinion, it's
> > as simple as that.
> >
>
> And let me tell you that a huge number of those people in the NSI database will
> level accusations of spam for doing such a thing.
>
> For NSI, or any organization, to do such a thing would be foolhardy, and would
> be unlikely to have any measurable result, especially balanced against the
> administrative nightmare it would create with all the complaints and "What is
> this?" type emails it would generate.
Maybe you're right. But InterNIC has the right to communicate with its
registrants. It sends them notices and bills and such. Couldn't it notify
them officially that a certain poll needed to be taken in order to determine
certain future operating parameters of its registration operation? I don't
see anything incorrect about a company polling its customers, do you?
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________
