Kent Crispin wrote,

>
> ccTLDs have a more interesting conundrum.  They don't want to submit
> to ICANN regulation.  But on the other hand, they want ICANN to
> endorse rfc1981 to give ccTLDs some protection against their
> associated sovereignties.  Of course, if I were ICANN I know how I
> would handle this :-)
>

A lot of ccTLDs want to ICANN to endorse RFC 1591 because they want
protection against ICANN.  They want stability.  They want continuity.  They
want to see some new standards before the old ones are thrown out.  It's not
as if ccTLDs are worried about the government "finding out" about them and
showing them the door.  They don't want a brand new principle of
"sovereignty" to be invoked (and it *is* new) that would threaten the
continuity of their operations.

Antony


__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________

Reply via email to