Although hampered by the weather and power outages on the east coast,
we are hoping that Mikki Barry can lead a team of editors to make
another attempt to meld additional DNSO stuff into our ORSC draft with
the objective of consolidating all parties positions into one complete
package that has potential for broad DNSO community consensus support.

This next round of drafting will end on Thursday, as that is when
contributions need to be given to the organizers of the 22 January
DNSO meeting in Washington, DC.  So, this is a best effort production.
It wil lber as good as can be completed by the deadline, and all otehr
work on it will have to await the results of the 22 Jan meeting.

This package of comments from ICC, as provided to the DNSO.ORG
drafting effort is just one more bundle of input ideas.  Comments on
this or other contributions are in order.  Please label them in our
subject headers with "ORSC DRAFT INPUT" as I did here...

Thanks for all your support...\Stef

------- Forwarded Message

From: Amadeu Abril i Abril <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-to: Amadeu Abril i Abril <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ICC DNSO principles
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 1999 18:43:09 +0100

Hi,

Below you will find the ICC DNSO principles, one of the two documents
they have prepared on DNSO issues that I just mentioned have been
posted in our Comments page.

Dr. Eberhard Lisse kindly forwarded the other one (Comments on the
BCN/MTY draft) yesterday ("ICC comments", at 20:53 GMT (but I have not
seen any posting of the "Principles" doc i this list.

[Kent Crispin forwarded both docuemnts to the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" list,
so many of you already have them].

Amadeu

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

                     ICC DNSO Principles

These Principles are submitted by ICC as a potential input
to the drafting process for a unified submission of the
Domain Name Supporting Organization.  The Principles can be
used for introductory or contextual purposes or as a
"chapeau" text.

1.   Statement of General DNSO Principles

    The Domain Names Supporting Organization (DNSO) shall
 advise the Board on issues relating to the Domain Name
 System (DNS), which include issues of stability, integrity
 and end-user concerns.

    The Names Council shall be nominated by, and
 representative of, the stakeholder constituencies of the
 DNSO and shall act as the coordinating entity and leadership
 within the DNSO.

    Nominees to the NC must have demonstrated knowledge and
 experience related to policy, legal, business or technical
 aspects of the DNS.

    All Internet stakeholders shall have the right to
 participate in the DNSO and the Names Council (NC) through
 representative constituencies and appropriate representative
 organisations.

    Such participation shall include representative
 organizations of technical, business, policy, legal and
 consumer interests that use domain names or participate in
 operation of the DNS. (note that we are talking of use, not
 necessarily ownership of domain names)

    There shall be broad international representation
 within the DNSO and NC reflecting, at a minimum,
 international levels of use of domain names and
 participation in the Internet.  (This should not be read to
 preclude the participation of those countries/regions which
 have not been able to fully take advantage of the Internet
 because of financial or technical constraints in the DNSO.
 The goal should be to develop a representative model, which
 respects the geographic diversity and participation of the
 world at large).

    The DNSO and NC shall seek to be independent and
 establish principles and processes which are independent of
 any single industry or interest group and must not be
 susceptible to capture or undue influence by any sectoral
 interest group.

    Individual stakeholders, whether or not also members of
 a representative stakeholder organisation, shall have the
 right to petition the DNSO directly on issues within its
 remit.

2.   Powers

    The DNSO and NC shall advise the board on all matters
 pertaining to the DNS.

    The DNSO shall nominate three directors designated to
 represent it on the Board.

    The NC, in consultation with the DNSO, shall develop
 and recommend actions, policies and procedures with regard
 to the DNS such as:

   -  recommendations with regard to the adding and removing,
   operation, management, assignment and development of gTLDs
   and ccTLDs.

   -  actions, policies and procedures to deal with
   trademark/intellectual property and privacy issues relating
   to the DNS.

    The policies and procedures recommended by the NC/DNSO
 shall be promulgated in keeping with the need to
 maintain/enhance the overall stability of the Internet and
 its utility as a global medium for communication and
 commerce among all parties.

    The DNSO shall have the right to comment on any
 recommended actions, policies and procedures put forward by
 other Supporting Organizations of the Board.


3.   Membership of the DNSO and NC

    Membership categories in the DNSO should reflect the
  broad and diverse nature of Internet stakeholders.

    Procedures must be in place within each stakeholder
  constituency to develop a system of selection and
  appointment of representatives.

    To maximize the benefits, effectiveness and breadth of
  participation within the DNSO, participation by
  representative organisations (including groups representing
  individual owners/users) as opposed to individuals should be
  encouraged.

    Each category shall be entitled to nominate the
  specified number of representatives on the DNSO.  The DNSO
  representatives will be responsible for appointing members
  of the Names Council.  The representatives from each
  category on the NC shall be drawn proportionately from the
  geographical regions described in the by-laws.

    Objective qualifications for DNSO and Names Council
  representatives should be developed.

    Term periods should be considered in light of
  difficulty to get the most qualified people to serve for
  long periods of time.  Staggered 2-year terms should be
  considered.



4.   Policy making process

    All actions, policies or procedures recommended by the
 DNSO and/or the NC must comply with both the DNSO and ICANN
 by-laws.

    Such recommendations must be made as a result of a fair
 and open consultative process with all Internet stakeholders
 that may be affected by a recommendation.

------- End of Forwarded Message


__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________

Reply via email to