I agree.
At 11:02 PM 1/16/99 -0800, Christopher Ambler wrote:
>I have reviewed quite a bit of what the dnso.org group has
>done, and cannot, in clear conscience, join them. I much
>prefer the open process that ORSC has begun, and would
>like to see it completed.
>
>I believe that if ORSC were to officially appoint a
>representative to the dnso.org group, it would be, in
>essence, condoning the methods and therefore the
>result of the dnso.org draft. I cannot support this. As a
>founding member of ORSC, I urge all ORSC to graciously
>decline the offer.
>
>I agree with Stef - the door is open to everyone, and that
>includes all those involved with the dnso.org group.
>
>--
>Christopher Ambler
>
>
>
--
"That's why there is a Protocol SO. To decide what the next
number after 16 is." - Dixon (tinc)
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________
