[IFWP] COMMENTS ON M.A.C. RECOMMENDATIONS of MARCH 18

[Onno Hovers]

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> I support most of the MAC recommedations, Mr. Cook.  Not all of them, but most of
> them.  I want the At-large Membership to be a large, open, democratic body; not a
> selective, wealthy group.  I want any Internet user to be eligible to serve on the
> Board of ICANN, not just the people hand-picked by a Nominating Committee.  I
> think membership should be fee-based, but our study indicates that adjusting fees
> for developing nations ends up costing more than it brings in. No matter what,  I
> do not want to see an ICANN operating at a deficit.

The IFWP list is full of professional nay-sayers, bitchers and
fruitcakes. First the ICANN was attacked for being elitist,
non-democratic and not transparant. 
And now the same people are attacking the ICANN for not being
elitist enough. I cannot understand what is wrong with a membership
that is totally open and democratic. The Membership Committee has
done an excellent work, IMO.

-- 
Onno Hovers ([EMAIL PROTECTED])