Joop Teernstra a �crit:
> Michael, in the DNSO there is no hard reality yet. We are being asked by
> the ICANN interim Board to help shape reality there.
> This is how I read their webpage and Esther's exhortations.
> You are most welcome to disagree with me and all those who support
> groupings that try to span across these damned constituencies in the DNSO.
> That will force us to keep our thinking sharp.
I'll accept that.
> What I am against is the limited number of startup constituencies and the
> (unintended?) effect of keeping a lot of people out, who are neither
> comfortable in a "business" constituency nor qualify for a NCDNHC .
Well that was engineered, first by the DNSO.org, then by the
trademarks people who took the relay from them. And the board went
along. Line of least resistance, probably, more than anything else
on their part, to give them the benefit of the doubt. But the result
isn't too good, is it? What you're doing is as logical a strategy as
any another perhaps, in such an illogical situation. And if business
takes over the non-commercial constituency, as it seems the board or
Sims or someone wants to help facilitate by favoring ISOC the Janus,
your IDNOC will be a nice place for the last of the IFWP to take a
stand. But I'm hoping that doesn't happen. :-)
