At 07:33 PM 4/13/99 -0400, you wrote:
Damn. This email is still not fixed. There is a din of incessant
self-serving, misconceived, kissy kissy babble going on here that
I just can't seem to get rid of.
Bill Lovell
>>You mean to tell me, there's a person who speaks clearly and
>>concisely, who hasnt succumbed to quackery and politicking, who
>>knows the problems -- and comes through with fair answers?
>>
>>She gets my vote for the Board, regardless of the constituencies.
>
>Kathy, of course, is too modest to pat herself on the back, but I will do
>it for her. It was a great job. Unfortunately fter she and Mike Doughney
>of DNRC presented comments to WIPO, DNRC was STILL not invited to assist in
>the formation of the trademark constituency, and has thusfar been
>specifically invited to ONE meeting that INTA has organized, namely the
>Toronto meeting. Since we were invited less than 36 hours prior, despite
>having asked for information over a month before, we were unable to attend.
>
>Kathy's well thought out proposal and set of solutions has not been
>discussed on any mailing list that I have seen, or anywhere else for that
>matter. If you have seen it, please point me to where, as I would like to
>participate in its discussion.
>
>
