I was just curious as to whether you have a workable scheme for
implementing your policy.
I do not think such a thing exists, and I have no suggestions for how
to do it.
I think the entire process is hosed and I am no longer interested in
helping ICANN make it look like I am supporting their actions adn
decisions, which I am clearly not supporting.
To date I have not seen any indication that they take anythign I say
or do in any serious way, though I have tried in many ways, including
private exchanges with Esther and others in ICANN.
Cheers...\Stef
>From your message Wed, 14 Apr 1999 22:01:54 -0400:
}
}Einar Stefferud a =E9crit:
}>=20
}> Your policy is most laudable.
}>=20
}> What is the mechanism for making this work in Berlin?
}
}Well, what I thought was I would ask each one who can't come to
}Berlin if they want to assign me their vote. If they do, they send
}me an email proxy saying so. If there are many who don't, I'll ask
}that all voting on propositions in Berlin be postponed until the
}next day, March 26 (the constituency will meet March 25, supposedly,
}although I had also thought of having a meeting on the 24th). What
}do you think?
}
}> }Every person who signs up for the NCDNHC through the ICIIU sign-up
}> }procedure gets a vote in the NCDNHC, whether they come to Berlin or
}> }not.
