All, FYI. Regards, -- Jeffrey A. Williams CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng. Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC. E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact Number: 972-447-1894 Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
this is the latest version of the draft - I've made modifications based on the discussion on the poised list and based on input from the ITU & W3C I expect the most significant change is the removal of the requirement for "free" access to standards - this was a hotly debated point on the poised list but I'm taking the view that Paul Hoffman expressed as making the most sense > When I wrote my piece on the high cost of ITU specs the other day, I did so > with the attitude of "they shouldn't be allowed in if they charge for > specs". I have now changed my mind, and think that "they should be allowed > in <grumble>". I agree with the folks who have pointed out that, as much as > we would like to force the ITU into our mold, this is not the place to do that > Just because we're the ones writing this document, doesn't mean that we > should use that fact to hurt or exclude someone else. We can do things our > way without forcing our way on others. Heck, we might even show kindness to > other groups who still don't get it. there have been a number of formatting changes and some text on openness added as well as a number of other smaller changes To meet ICANN's timetable for their next meeting a proposal must be submitted to them this week. Scott ----------- DRAFT --- DRAFT --- DRAFT --- DRAFT --- DRAFT --- DRAFT April 20 1999 Protocol Supporting Organization 1. Definition of the PSO. a. Purpose The Protocol Support Organization (PSO) will be a consensus- based advisory body within the ICANN framework. b. Components The PSO will establish a "Protocol Council" and host an annual open meeting (known as the "General Assembly" (described below)). c. Creation through a Memorandum of Understanding Arrangements regarding the PSO are to be reflected in a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) among ICANN and a group of open international Internet related standards development organizations (SDOs). SDOs must satisfy a set of objective criteria before they can be considered for membership. (see Appendix A) The initial signatories of the MOU are expected to be ICANN, IETF, the ITU and W3C. All existing signatories must agree to the admission of new signatories. 2. The Protocol Council a. Members. The Protocol Council will have up to [12] individual members selected by the SDO signatories of the MOU. (see below) b. Term. The term of Protocol Council members will be 2 years. Removal will be pursuant to procedures established through the MOU. (Initial terms will be 1 and 2 years to provide initial conditions for staggered terms.) c. Powers/Duties of the Protocol Council. i Appointment of ICANN Directors. The Protocol Council will nominate 3 Directors to the ICANN Board (By-laws, Art. V, Sec. 4(iii)). The initial directors would have terms of 1, 2 and 3 years (By-laws, Art. V, Sec. 9(d) The Protocol Council will conduct an open call for nominations for any open PSO seats on the ICANN board. Each SDO signatory to the MOU is entitled to nominate candidates by procedures of its own choosing. Additionally, nominations from the public at large should be allowed under conditions to be defined by the Protocol Council. The Protocol Council will select the PSO nominees to the ICANN board from among these nominees by a means of its own choosing. ii Qualifications of ICANN Directors No more than 2 PSO-nominated Directors may come from the same geographic region. iii Role of ICANN Directors The Directors appointed by the Protocol Council will not represent the PSO on the Board, but will function as full Directors of ICANN. (By-laws, Art. V, Sec. 8) iv Advisory Role. The Protocol Council will advise the Board of ICANN on matters referred to the Protocol Council by the ICANN Board. As per the ICANN By-laws, only matters relating to the assignment of parameters for Internet protocols would be so referred. d. Policy Development. The ICANN By-laws vest in the Protocol Council the primary responsibility for developing and recommending substantive policies in the area of protocol parameter assignment. Since the specific policies for parameter assignment for particular protocols are the responsibility of the SDO that developed the related protocol, the Protocol Council will only have the responsibility to develop and recommend related substantive policies for the specific case where additional cooperative initiatives are required (e.g., in the case of a conflict) and resolution cannot be arranged through bilateral discussions between SDOs. As recognized in the U.S. Departmant of Commerce White Paper, "The Internet succeeds in great measure because it is a decentralized system that encourages innovation and maximizes individual freedom." Therefore, in the tradition of the Internet, conflict resolution mechanisms in which the involved parties work things out themselves will be preferred to mechanisms requiring third-party intervention 3. Annual Open Meeting (General Assembly) a. The Protocol Council will periodically host an open meeting ("General Assembly") for promoting discussion and receiving input regarding the work of the PSO. A General Assembly meeting will be held at least once per year, and will permit open participation by all interested individuals. The annual open meeting will be held in conjunction with a major meeting of one of the SDOs that have signed the MOU. (with an effort to hold no 2 consecutive meetings in the same geographic region. It is expected that the major SDOs within the Internet protocol standards development community will provide the constituency of the General Assembly. b. Selection of Protocol Council Members. Prior to the annual open meeting, the Protocol Council shall make an open call for nominations to the upcoming vacancies in the Protocol Council. Each SDO signatory to the PSO MOU will be entitled to make nominations for some or all of the vacant seats by a procedure of its own choosing. In the event that there are more nominees than vacancies, an election will be held in which each SDO signatory to the PSO MOU has equal votes. Protocol Council Members should fairly represent, to the extent reasonable, all constituencies within the member SDOs, including the major technical areas and geographical regions. 4. Open Proceedings and Documents a. Communications between ICANN and the PSO All communications between ICANN and the PSO will be made public on the PSO web site. In the event that ICANN requests that a communication be kept confidential, the PSO will honor this request for a fixed period of time not to exceed one year, and then make the communication public. b. PSO Proceedings All discussions of PSO business will be conducted on a publicly-archived mailing list accessible through the PSO web site. The schedule for the PSO meetings will be posted 90 days in advance of the meeting date. The agenda for the Protocol Council and annual open meetings will be posted on the PSO web site at least 30 days before the meetings. The minutes from all PSO meetings will be publicly posted on the PSO web site within 30 days of the meeting. 5. Review of MOU. The MOU signatories will periodically review the results and consequences of their cooperation under the MOU. When appropriate, the signatories will consider the need for improvements in the MOU and make suitable proposals for modifying and updating the arrangements and scope of the MOU 6. Recognition. ICANN will officially recognize the PSO described in this memo as the PSO under the ICANN By-laws Art. 6, Sec. 3. Appendix A - requirements for consideration as a PSO-qualified SDO SDOs must be open, international, voluntary technical standard and technical specification development organizations which: 1) Develop standards and/or specifications for use over the public Internet. 2) Can demonstrate active membership in the IP-related standards and/or specification development process of more than 1000 individuals, if individual memberships are used by the organization, or 100 companies, if corporate memberships are used by the organization. 3) Has been in operation for 3 or more years at the time of their application. 4) Can demonstrate that there is significant deployment of its standards on the Internet. 5) The significant protocols controlled by the organization can be implemented without paying a licensing fee to the organization Open international voluntary standards bodies are defined as international organizations that plan, develop or establish voluntary standards. An organization shall be considered open and international if its standards and/or specifications development process is open to any person or organization of any nationality on equitable terms. It shall be considered voluntary if it makes no claim to compel use of its standards and specifications.
