Adam and all, Well I was referring to AOL, CORE and Melbourne IT. These were the three that I had predicted publicly would be one of the 5 test bed registrars. In other words, the fix was in from the beginning as Chris Ambler predicted some time ago, referencing CORE, of course. And I completely agree with that analysis. Good call Chirs! However your point is well taken also here. Seems like four of the five were not very good choices. However that should have been expected. Adam Rothschild wrote: > register.com should definitely not be a registrar. these are the folks > who allowed their servers to get 0wn3d due to lack of security, and then > were unable to clean up the mess and prevent themselves from doing harm to > others in a timely manner. > > the NANOG archives tell no lies. > > but, i digress... > > -a > > On Wed, 21 Apr 1999, Jeff Williams wrote: > > ->All, > -> > -> Well well, looks like I was correct after all as were some others > ->as well. Looks like I got three out of the five right as to whom would > ->be the ICANN "Choice" selections for the 5 new test bed registrars > ->for SRS under the new collective dictatorship regime of ICANN. > -> > ->Regards, > -> > ->-- > ->Jeffrey A. Williams > ->CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng. > ->Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC. > ->E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ->Contact Number: 972-447-1894 > ->Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208 > -> > -> > > Regards, -- Jeffrey A. Williams CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng. Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC. E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact Number: 972-447-1894 Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
