At 08:53 AM 4/26/99 -0400, A.M. Rutkowski wrote:
>Not to mess with someone's coughed up hairballs, but...

Yup.  So much better to cough up one's own, and this one really has been 
sticking in Tony's craw...

>On the ITU process issues, the MoU gambit actually revectored
>ITU history a bit.  The MoU was not only not approved by the
>Plenipotentiary Conference (the ITU's governmental governing

The ITU also did not approve world peace or a special prize for Tony.

There are all sorts of things the ITU didn't approve because they weren't 
on the ITUY's agenda.

Notes from the meeting show no discussion of the gTLD MoU, contrary to a 
loud announcement that Tony disseminated at the time.  His announcement 
claimed all sorts of dire effects and decisions.  Unfortunately, there is 
no documentation to support the claims, just as there are none to support 
the claims he is making here.  No surprise, they are the same claims.

During Tony's original effort to make these claims, he gave a single 
citation to a large body of text.  Several of us reviewed it in detail and 
could find no text to support his claims.

He was asked to cite the SPECIFIC text supporting his claims.  He did not 
respond.

I'm sure that he will now be more forthcoming with substantiation for these 
false claims.

d/

ps.  Meanwhile I notice that the discussion has moved on to focus solely on 
the question of IANA "authority" and has otherwise ignored that rather 
considerable array of misstatements in Meek's article.  Of course, it's 
greatly interesting to see such vigorous assertions of fact about IANA's 
authority from people who have had no experience in actually dealing with 
IANA and its decision processes.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Dave Crocker                                         Tel: +1 408 246 8253
Brandenburg Consulting                               Fax: +1 408 273 6464
675 Spruce Drive                             <http://www.brandenburg.com>
Sunnyvale, CA 94086 USA                 <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to