David and all, David R. Conrad wrote: > Ed, > > > Because it makes business sense. This answers your question above, > > in my view. > > So, you are relying on the rest of the world to have the same business > sensibilities as you do. > > An interesting assumption. I don't see where Ed is making that assumption at all David. But I see that you believe that he is. Which seems very telling in a way... > > > The term that used to be heard around the Internet for this was > "enlightened self-interest". Strangely enough, you don't hear that term > much anymore. > > Perhaps I am too cynical, having watched this DNS insanity from the very > beginning. I simply do not believe a system without constraints will > result in a lack of conflicts. No one is, including Ed here, suggesting that there be no constraints. In fact the contrary. It is a matter of WHAT constraints and how they are determined. > Indeed, I would imagine there are many > people out there who see great "business sense" in engineering conflicts > in order to attract traffic to their web sites. As such, the solution > you propose does not appear viable. In my view. Unfortunately, again David you fail to understand Ed's perspective. He nor anyone that I know of has or is suggesting "engineering conflicts" as a vehicle of any sort as means of protracting a solution or even to a solution. Why would you or anyone assume this? WHere did you get this idea? Certainly not from anything Ed has posted on this and other threads. So I would submit that, yes, you are entirely to cynical to this degree anyway. And as Einstein once said, "Cynics never accomplish much." I hold with that statement. > > > Regards, > -drc > "Everything is wonderful until you know something about it" -- Dzoey > > Regards, -- Jeffrey A. Williams CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng. Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC. E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact Number: 972-447-1894 Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
