>From today's Washington Post: "NSI argues that it has an exclusive right to the database because the company's original agreement with the National Science Foundation specified that it would own any "intellectual property" created by the address-registration business. "It's very clear that we have the rights to this data," said NSI spokesman Christopher Clough." Mr. Clough, can you please clarify your statement in view of the Supreme Court's Feist decision - specifically, what data in the whois database might rise to be intellectual property? The fictitious names and addresses would remain the property of the DN owner.
- [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Bill Lovell
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Mikki Barry
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Bill Lovell
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Mikki Barry
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Bill Lovell
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Martin B. Schwimmer
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Martin B. Schwimmer
- Re: Feist (was Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigati... Martin B. Schwimmer
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Richard J. Sexton
- RE: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Marsh, Miles (Gene)
- RE: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI A.M. Rutkowski
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI William X. Walsh
- RE: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Dave Crocker
- RE: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI cgomes
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating... William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Martin B. Schwimmer
