On Tue, May 11, 1999 at 04:55:10PM -0400, Bret Fausett wrote:
[...]
> The only statement in the ISOC proposal is ISOC's "belief that it is
> impractical to have both individual members and organizations as voting
> members within a constituency...." Please explain. And no sniping
> responses please. I'm serious. Why is ISOC's model better?
How is it different?
An "individual company" is not an "individual". An individual
company is a commercial *organization*. Individual non-profits are
welcome in the ISOC model -- ISOC *is* an individual organization.
There are the end-cases of one-person companies and one person
organizations, to be sure, but that problem exists in both cases.
--
Kent Crispin "Do good, and you'll be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] lonesome." -- Mark Twain
