In message <000901be9c24$409031a0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "John B. Reynolds"
writes:
> > John, in ANY US court, if ICIIU is a DE corp it IS, by
> > definition, a legally entitled organization. The number of
> > members are irrelevant. The ease with which such a license is
> > obtainable is also irrelevant. The legal entity has legal rights,
> > period, full-stop. Are you one of those that maintain that we
> > should ignore the law? I think that we have had enough of those
> > types of arguments already. IMHO, it is one of the MAIN reasons
> > that the Internet is in the shape it is in. Proper attention to
> > the legal details, verses denial, early on, would have taken care
> > of many of these issues already.
>
> Since when does the phrase "in any real sense of the word" translate
> to "in the eyes of the law"? The "ICIIU" may be a *legal*
> organization, but it is not a "real" one in the sense that most
> people understand the term.
Well, if I look at what is going on here on this list, it's quite
surreal:
Jeff the Man (doesn't exist), Willie the Whiner (doesn't like Jeff
even if it doesn't exist), the K*nt (I have met him, so he does exist,
unfortunately), d'Crock (I am not sure, probably not), a bunch of
pimply cyber police reservists, the ORSC Uebervater (I have met him,
he's running a huge affair of an organization, of which he is the only
member), Bob Allisat (I do miss his language).
Should have someone read you the nonsense you write.
Yes, I am having fun.
el
