On Fri, 21 May 1999 01:05:31 +0100, Dr Eberhard W Lisse
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Willie whines:
>
>> >> You think only people holding COM/NET/ORG domain names
>> >> qualify as non-commercial ?
>> >
>> >You are absolutely right, and I am posting a correction to the
>> >notice. Thank you for pointing out this oversight.
>> >
>> >> Isn't it also a bit strange that
>> >> holders of COM domain names are non-commercial ?
>> >
>> >They most definitely are not, and they won't be accepted, rest
>> >assured.
>>
>> I can think of PLENTY of COM domain name holders that are
>> non-commercial.
>
>When will you realize that nobody gives an expletive what you think,
>say or do?
>
>> This just goes to show why this person, using an organization moniker
>> to avoid the fact that he only speaks for himself, has no business
>> trying to be the primary "organizer" of such a constituency.
>
>First of all this is not true.
Most certainly it IS true.
> Secondly so are you.
No, I never do that, El, and you can even speak to the founder of the
IDNO over my concerns of whether I should be listed under by business
domain, which I own as an individual, or under my personal domain.
I am always very careful to avoid this trap that Michael has fallen
into, and there is a history to back me up.
> Thirdly so is just
>about everyone around here.
Once again a statement not backed up in fact.
> Fourthly what's it to you?
I think ICANN has set the record straight themselves.
What is means is an attempt to make sure as much integrity is brought
to this process as the flawed structure will permit.
But since you admit you are only here to have fun and play games,
integrity is not important to you.
--
William X. Walsh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
General Manager, DSo Internet Services
