John B. Reynolds a �crit:
>
> You have no more authority to unilaterally set NCDNHC attendance requirements
> than do your opponents to hold Names Council elections.
It's a standard procedure to require proof of identity at all
membership meetings, otherwise people who don't belong can disrupt
or take over the meeting. All organizations I've ever belonged to do
the same. It's quite normal. What's more, in this particular case
there are two extra and very good reasons for it: one, the room
isn't very large, and two, many people who are not non-commercial
domain name holders are threatening to come and try to take over the
constituency. Obviously, the non-commercial domain name holders are
not going to allow them to do this.
> If I were ICANN, I
> would have hotel security eject you should you attempt to prevent others from
> entering the meeting room.
Well, as it turns out, Germans are rather sensistive to fascistic
attempts to take over other people's meetings, so I would tend to
think that any German authorities would be rather more sympathetic
to the non-commercial domain name holders than the people crashing
the meeting. Seems logical, no?
