Roeland and all,

  Roeland, this is one place that the evidence overwhelmingly thus far
in this process, does not agree with you contention with respect to
Ester Dyson.  I was SHOCKED that you stated that she is s
"Streight-Shooter" in that you have been involved in this process
for some time now.  Just a few of the reasons why I am SHOCKED at
you position on Esther are as follows:

1.) If Esther was such a "Streight-Shooter" than why did she not
     Straight out answer Jay Fenello's question from two weeks ago on this
     Very list?

2.) If Esther was such a "Streight-Shooter" than why did she plain lie to me

  over telephone last october, which I have recorded by the way?

3.) If Esther was such a "Streight-Shooter" than why has she not come out
     publicly regarding the "Closed" ICANN INterim Board meetings either
     in favor or not in favor?

4.) If Esther was such a "Streight-Shooter" than why has she not answered
     some 26 questions that I personally have put to her here publicly?

5.) If Esther was such a "Streight-Shooter" than why when Gordon Cook
     ask here several questions, that she either did not answer them at all,

     or did not directly answer them regarding the ICANN Bylaws?

I could of course go on and on, but I believe this is sufficient...
NOPE I cannot agree with your evaluation of Esther Dysons
ethics as it relates to the ICANN process...


Roeland M.J. Meyer wrote:

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > Dr Eberhard W Lisse
> > Sent: Monday, May 24, 1999 12:35 AM
> >
> > Brian
> >
> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Brian C.
> > Hollingsworth" writes:
> >
> > > I must completely agree with Dr. Lisse's contention here given the
> > > research that I personally have done on Mr. Crispin.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > > However the EU is also finding most recently that Ms. Dysons
> > > judgment is also severally lacking as well.
> >
> > That is an entirely different issue. I am personally convinced,
> > though, that she does *NOT* have ulterior motives.
>
> That is one place where we can definitely agree. Clueless she may be,
> but she's a straight-shooter. If she is going to stick a knife into you,
> she's going to look you in the eyes while doing it, not the back of your
> head. Unless, it is by accident. The person I met, in SF, has that sort
> of courage. However, the rest of the ICANN BoD continues to demonstrate
> the opposite.
>
> Just think of all the slimier ways this entire ICANN thing *could* have
> been done otherwise. Unfortunately, she is a band of ONE. Roberts and
> Simms do not hold to the same ethical standard, as has been well
> documented. The others, of the ICANN BoD, are relatively unknown, to
> this date, and THAT is a major problem. Even a CoB can be over-ridden by
> a majority vote, of the BoD. If there is a hidden agenda, it is not
> Esther that is hiding it, not voluntarily.

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact Number:  972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208

Reply via email to