At 08:44 AM 5/23/99 -0800, you wrote:
>Setting aside my personal doubts about the effectiveness of a constituency
>structure for the DNSO,
Having just retruend from Berlin, I have to observe your doubts are entirely
justified.
I have developed a side-by-side comparison of the
>three Non Commercial Domain Name Holder Constituency proposals.
>
> See http://www.domainhandbook.com/ncdhc.html
>
>This is an independent, impartial, and pro bono effort which should help
>clarify the differences among the three proposals and facilitate the NCDNHC
>meeting in Berlin on May 25. Please share this URL with others who have an
>interest in this slice of the DNSO pie.
>
>Next up, time permitting, the same approach with the IP constituency proposals.
>
>The Force be with you.
The NC constituency was the only constituency that was not recognized.
Som there are 6 commercial constituencies. Only. Sort of appropriate
considering the Department of Commerce had it's hand in this. :-)
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Remember, amateurs built the Ark. Professionals built the Titanic.
