At 06:44 AM 5/25/99 -0400, you wrote:
>At 01:07 AM 5/25/99 , Karl Auerbach wrote:
>
>>(I do believe that NSI ought to be required to act in some affirmative way
>>to diminish some of its preferential position vis a vis any new
>>registrars/registries that may try to arise. I'm not particularly willing
>>to bet that such a thing would occur, however.)
>
>If you look at the exponential rate of increase of domain name
>registrations, it is obvious that dramatic, equal opportunities
>exist for all registrars in acquiring new registrants. With
>those growth rates, the market share opportunities are in the
>future rather than the past.
>
>Indeed, what will be most interesting is comparing the US and
>Canadian situations. The CA domain is one of the world's largest,
>and undergoing a similar registry-registrar bifurcation that was
>specified last September. It might be useful to hear a little
>about the implementation and competition progress and compare with
>COM, ORG, and NET.
>
>
>--tony
All the decisions are made by the .CA name holders as
an autonomous collective.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Remember, amateurs built the Ark. Professionals built the Titanic.
