I need only point out the conversations and results from Berlin. NSI successfully (in conjunction with ICANN attorneys) argued that NSI is the ONLY group with a right to gTLD recognition in the gTLD DNSO constituency effort.
Gene...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, May 31, 1999 8:39 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [IFWP] Goose and gander
>
>
> On Mon, 31 May 1999 20:38:29 -0400, "Marsh, Miles (Gene)"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >Hash: SHA1
> >
> > "The spirit of the actions taken in Berlin were
> > contrary to the sprit of the white paper--that
> > decisions be consensus based and bottom up.
> > This move on the WIPO paper was top down,"
> > said Brian O'Shaughnessy, spokesman for
> > Network Solutions.
> >
> >...as was the decision to make NSI the only gTLD DNSO representative,
> >Mr. O'Shaughnessy. Please be careful with your hipocrasy, it's
> >awfully flagrant.
> >
> >.
>
> Please enlighten us, did NSI specifically oppose them being a part of
> the gTLD constituency?
>
> Can anyone substantiate this? If so, it is a break from the NSI
> position a few months back.
>
>
>
> --
> William X. Walsh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> General Manager, DSo Internet Services
> Fax:(209) 671-7934
>
> The Law is not your mommy or daddy to go
> crying to every time you have something
> to whimper about.
>
