Oh spare me Jeff. If I thought Michael would be a serious and
qualified leader for this constituency and would serve the role of
their representative in a positive fashion, he'd have my support.
But I have serious concerns over someone who would form an
organization for the sole purpose of trying to gain credibility that
he so terribly failed to obtain as an individual.
Why do you have to insist on turning this into something much lower
than that?
On Tue, 01 Jun 1999 13:34:06 +0100, Jeff Williams
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>William, Richard and all,
>
> Sounds allot like a "Sour Grapes" response from William here to me.
>
> I seems that you hit a nerve here on William Richard. >;) None the less
>I believe that you were "Spot On", personally.. Good man there Richard!
>>;)
>
>William X. Walsh wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 1 Jun 1999 09:12:32 -0400 (EDT), "Richard J. Sexton"
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> >>I could go and incorporate the "Comedian Domain Name Holders Congress"
>> >>tomorrow, but that doesn't mean that it has any validity in this
>> >>process.
>> >
>> >Well yeah, but there's talk and there's actions. I've seen you
>> >talk and I've seen Michael act.
>>
>> There mere act is not enough to make a leader.
>>
>> And I'm not suggesting >>I<< belong in that role, either, Richard.
>>
>> So your comment (which borders on a personal attack I would think is
>> beneath you) is invalid anyway.
>>
>> --
>> William X. Walsh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> General Manager, DSo Internet Services
>> Fax:(209) 671-7934
>>
>> The Law is not your mommy or daddy to go
>> crying to every time you have something
>> to whimper about.
>
>Regards,
