>>> Now before there is an attempt to distract the list's attention with
>> unfounded accusations about my affiliations, I note that I am not employed
>> by or paid by or represent anyone jockeying for position for control of the
>> non-commercial constituency, and I don't really care who wins out.
>
>Nothing could be further from the truth than this totally
>disingenuous claim. You are obviously a partisan of Mr. Maher, a
>trademark attorney like yourself and representing the same or
>similar interests, and with whose now-defunct POC your organization
>the INTA has had an agreement to collaborate since the days of the
>IAHC. The same is true of the relationship between the INTA and
>ISOC. Your INTA forms one leg of the ISOC/CORE/INTA conspiracy that
>almost got control of the DNS in 1997, and which is behind the
>reactionary coup d'etat that has been perpetrated on the White Paper
>process and the Internet community now. You are, in short, a liar.
>

I am not employed by or paid by or represent David Maher and don't care
whether he controls the non-commercial constituency, assuming, according to
you, that that is one of his ambitions.  To the best of my knowledge, he is
not a member of INTA.  I am a trademark lawyer like him, Senator McCarthy.

Reply via email to