>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: Thu, 3 Jun 1999 04:57:46 -0400 (EDT) >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Non-member submission from ["Teddy A. Purwadi" ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] > >>From iix.net.id!policy Thu Jun 3 04:57:44 1999 >Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Received: from raptor.access.net.id([202.180.0.14]) (2875 bytes) by ns1.vrx.net > via sendmail with P:esmtp/D:aliases/T:pipe > (sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) > id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 3 Jun 1999 04:57:39 -0400 (EDT) > (Smail-3.2.0.100 1997-Dec-8 #2 built 1997-Dec-18) >Received: from marketing (marketing.access.net.id [202.180.0.248]) > by raptor.access.net.id (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with SMTP id PAA03733; > Thu, 3 Jun 1999 15:51:21 -0700 (GMT) >Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Unverified) >X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32) >Date: Sat, 05 Jun 1999 15:42:21 +0700 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (William X. Walsh), [EMAIL PROTECTED], > [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] >From: "Teddy A. Purwadi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: Perplexed in the Face of Anger, Acrimony & ~Evidence >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Mime-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > >All, >Commercial/Non-Commercial, and/or >Profit/Non-Profit organizations, >are thin layers to be understandable. > >I have a good book, title: >"Financial Planning for Non-Profit Organization " >by Jody Blazek >Publisher:John Willey & Son Inc. >ISBN:0-471-12589-x >Edition: 1996 > >For me, >This is a good guidance to make financial reports. > >-teddy >http://www.mii.or.id >http://www.iix.net.id > >At 05:24 03/06/99 GMT, William X. Walsh wrote: >>On Thu, 3 Jun 1999 01:26:23 +0200, Onno Hovers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>wrote: >> >>>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >>>>At 02:37 PM 6/2/99 -0500, Kevin M. Kelly wrote: >>>>>Be assured that you are not alone. I must admit that (a few steps behind >>>>>ICANN) I find it increasingly difficult to see credible representation for >>>>>the non-commercial domain holders. >>> >>>> As nearly as I can tell, the stance being taken by some folks is that >ICANN >>>> should, somehow, provide a position for non-commercial holders, without >>>> there being any credible group to occupy the space. >>> >>>> Where is the credible group that represents non-commercial domain holders? >>> >>>Do you feel that the ISOC proposal and the group that supported it is >>>not 'a credible group that represents non-commercial domain holders'? >>>If so, why? >> >>Not without the modifications endorced by Mueller and ACM. >> >>ISOC has too many commercial interests that are involved in this also >>to be said to be totally impartial. There are potential conflicts of >>interest that need to be resolved with regards to the ISOC, and as >>such, they should not be the dominating force behind the NCDNHC. >> >> >> >>-- >>William X. Walsh [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>General Manager, DSo Internet Services >>Fax:(209) 671-7934 >> >>The Law is not your mommy or daddy to go >>crying to every time you have something >>to whimper about. >> >> > > > > -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Remember, amateurs built the Ark. Professionals built the Titanic.
