>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Thu, 3 Jun 1999 04:57:46 -0400 (EDT)
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]:    Non-member submission from ["Teddy A. Purwadi" 
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]   
>
>>From iix.net.id!policy Thu Jun  3 04:57:44 1999
>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Received: from raptor.access.net.id([202.180.0.14]) (2875 bytes) by ns1.vrx.net
>       via sendmail with P:esmtp/D:aliases/T:pipe
>       (sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) 
>       id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>       for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 3 Jun 1999 04:57:39 -0400 (EDT)
>       (Smail-3.2.0.100 1997-Dec-8 #2 built 1997-Dec-18)
>Received: from marketing (marketing.access.net.id [202.180.0.248])
>       by raptor.access.net.id (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with SMTP id PAA03733;
>       Thu, 3 Jun 1999 15:51:21 -0700 (GMT)
>Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Unverified)
>X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32)
>Date: Sat, 05 Jun 1999 15:42:21 +0700
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (William X. Walsh), [EMAIL PROTECTED],
>        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: "Teddy A. Purwadi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Perplexed in the Face of Anger, Acrimony & ~Evidence
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>All,
>Commercial/Non-Commercial, and/or
>Profit/Non-Profit organizations,
>are thin layers to be understandable.
>
>I have a good book, title:
>"Financial Planning for Non-Profit Organization "
>by Jody Blazek
>Publisher:John Willey & Son Inc.
>ISBN:0-471-12589-x
>Edition: 1996
>
>For me,
>This is a good guidance to make financial reports.
>
>-teddy
>http://www.mii.or.id
>http://www.iix.net.id 
>
>At 05:24 03/06/99 GMT, William X. Walsh wrote:
>>On Thu, 3 Jun 1999 01:26:23 +0200, Onno Hovers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>>>>At 02:37 PM 6/2/99 -0500, Kevin M. Kelly wrote:
>>>>>Be assured that you are not alone.  I must admit that (a few steps behind
>>>>>ICANN) I find it increasingly difficult to see credible representation for
>>>>>the non-commercial domain holders.
>>>
>>>> As nearly as I can tell, the stance being taken by some folks is that
>ICANN
>>>> should, somehow, provide a position for non-commercial holders, without
>>>> there being any credible group to occupy the space.
>>>
>>>> Where is the credible group that represents non-commercial domain holders?
>>>
>>>Do you feel that the ISOC proposal and the group that supported it is
>>>not 'a credible group that represents non-commercial domain holders'?
>>>If so, why?
>>
>>Not without the modifications endorced by Mueller and ACM.
>>
>>ISOC has too many commercial interests that are involved in this also
>>to be said to be totally impartial.  There are potential conflicts of
>>interest that need to be resolved with regards to the ISOC, and as
>>such, they should not be the dominating force behind the NCDNHC.
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>William X. Walsh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>General Manager, DSo Internet Services
>>Fax:(209) 671-7934
>>
>>The Law is not your mommy or daddy to go 
>>crying to every time you have something 
>>to whimper about.
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Remember, amateurs built the Ark. Professionals built the Titanic.

Reply via email to