Since some people insist on not following net etiquette, perhaps the
list software could be set to strip Priority headers on list traffic.
There is no useful purpose for it on mailing lists anyway.
Richard?
On Fri, 04 Jun 1999 17:54:40 +0100, Jeff Williams
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Chris and all,
>
> That is terrible the you are so bothered. Maybe resetting your rules
>for your inbox reset to something more appropriate would be in order.
>
> Just a suggestion of course...
>
>Christopher Ambler wrote:
>
>> Might I politely request that the posters to this list not use the "high
>> priority" feature
>> except when absolutely warranted? I have my inbox rules set to forward any
>> email
>> that I receive, with the priority set to high, to my pager. Lately, many
>> posts have
>> been so marked that were not priority at all (indeed, I'd say that many of
>> them
>> could accurately be marked as low priority).
>>
>> Much appreciated.
>>
>> --
>> Christopher Ambler
>> Personal Opinion Only, of course
>> This address belongs to a resident of the State of Washington
>> who does not wish to receive any unsolicited commercial email
>
>Regards,
--
William X. Walsh
General Manager, DSo Internet Services
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax:(209) 671-7934
The Law is not your mommy or daddy to go crying
to every time you have something to whimper about.
