Esther Dyson a �crit:
> Basically, the sense of the board is that this policy, whatever it
> eventually involves, should probably address all (nonpolitical) disputes
> over names, not just the "abusive" registrations that WIPO focuses on.
> ("all commercial disputes linked" to domain name registrations may be
> overbroad, as opposed to commercial disputes over names themselves.)
This seems to be aclear admission that ICANN intends to act not only
as a regulatory agency but as the legislative and judicial branch of
the "Internet government".
