Hi.
Richard Sexton wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >I'd say this is a pretty clear determination of the effects NSI's
> >prepayment requirement is going to have on its new and future
> >prospective registrars.
>
> Where were you 6 months ago when it seemed like I was the only one on
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] advocating no prepayment???
>
The big issue, as I see it, is not "prepayment yes" vs. "prepayment no",
but "prepayment yes for some and no for others".
It is self-evident (please correct me if I'm wrong) that this situation is
not a level field for competition.
Regards
Roberto
- [IFWP] Re: Register.com and the Testbed charges effect Anonymous
- [IFWP] Re: [discuss] Re: Register.com and the Testb... Anonymous
- [IFWP] Re: Register.com and the Testbed charges eff... Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Register.com and the Testbed charges... Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [discuss] RE: [IFWP] Re: Register.com and the T... Roberto Gaetano
- Re: [discuss] RE: [IFWP] Re: Register.com and t... William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Register.com and the Testbed cha... Jeff Williams
- Re: [dnso.discuss] Re: [discuss] RE: [IFWP] Re:... Jeff Williams
- RE: [IFWP] Re: Register.com and the Testbed cha... Patrick Greenwell
- [IFWP] Re: Register.com and the Testbed charges eff... William X. Walsh
