At 11:38 PM 6/12/99 GMT, William X. Walsh wrote:
>On Sun, 13 Jun 1999 01:24:58 +0200, Javier SOLA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Anthony,
>>
>>The agreement was that all meetings will be kept open if possible. Our only
>>concern is disruption. If there is disruption that does not permit the
>>meeting, we would try to remove only disruptive individuals, if this is not
>>enough, we would only close the meetings as a last resort. We really hope
>>that this will not happen. We will have to see how we handle
>>teleconferences, as there is a cost problem involved in not knowing how
>>many people would join.
>>
>>It should be very clear that by disruption we do not mean censorship,
>>Disruption means not allowing the meeting to take place by constantly
>>talking out of turn, interrupting others or being generally disruptive in
>>any other way. Disruptive in form, not on contents.
>>
>>All this should be in the minutes when they are posted.
>
>The problem here Javier is the propensity of people such as you to
>consider any criticisms from those outside your own "thought camps" to
>be "disruptive."
>
>Personally, I don't trust YOU to make that determination.
I tried to participate as an observer in the NC telecon that
was officially charied by Thersa sombody, didn't say anything
and Javier kicked me off after 15 seconds.
Shame on you Javier.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Remember, amateurs built the Ark. Professionals built the Titanic.
