On Tue, 15 Jun 1999 00:53:42 -0400, Milton Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

>Kent:
>I was in Berlin. You were not.
>The two or three speakers who spoke out against NSI having additional seats
>were all CORE members. The session is on record, by the way.

Of course it was Milton.  In Kent's mind CORE eq Vast Consensus.

And now two CORE supporters (Kent and Dave) are trying to disrupt the
creation of the IDNO.  When asked why they joined the forum, if they
supported its goals, what was their intention as non-member
participants, etc, they refused to answer.  

Why?  

To take a couple of the comments he answered with :

"This is not a police state"

"My intentions are completely immaterial"

Yet they have almost succeeded in doing exactly what they tried to do
in the ORSC forum.  

They now level arguments that the IDNO list should be open, but their
registrar constituency is not open.  Is this a conflict in their
positions?  Of course it is, but they will make up some justification
for it, I'm sure.

Nothing but a couple of kids playing little games.

The unfortunate part is that they get away with it.



--
William X. Walsh
General Manager, DSo Internet Services
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Fax:(209) 671-7934

"Let the people think they govern and they will be governed."
- William Penn, founder of Pennsylvania

Reply via email to