Michael, I have often supported your opinion on subjects. I believe you bring some valuable perspectives to the discussions. However, I believe you are misguided in questioning the value of Joe Sims' participation in these discussions. I do not agree with much of his discourse, either. But isn't it better to have his opinion heard here where we can all comment upon it, rather than in secrecy, where we know not what he is thinking? Gene Marsh +++++ Hi Michael Sondow, you wrote on 6/21/99 2:44:28 PM: >Mikki Barry wrote: > > Lastly, I'd like to reiterate how helpful it is that you are engaging > >in discourse on this list. Thank you for choosing to do that. > >In what way is it helpful? Helpful to the plans of the ICANN board, >perhaps, but how is it helpful to you? > >Hasn't it occurred to you that Joe Sims has entered into discussions >because the board is becoming frightened that, because of the recent >increase in opposition to them, they may be subjected to public >scrutiny and ICANN dismembered, and so are making a larger effort to >sew doubt in the opposition? How does this help the opposition? Do >you imagine that you are going to convince Joe Sims that what he has >done is wrong, and that he will then go to the California Attorney >General and ask for ICANN to be unincorporated, or publicly abjure >the board? > >What he is doing is simply a renewed attempt at propaganda, so as to >reduce the opposition as far as possible. Nothing else. A man who >has done what he has, and who has lied about it to Congress, isn't >going to change his plans because Mikki Barry or anyone else has a >superior argument. You let yourself be flattered too much by the >fact that he is talking to you. Pull yourself together. +++++++++++++++++++++ I'm very happy @.HOME Gene Marsh president, anycastNET Incorporated
