>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 27 05:17:24 1999
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail.iprolink.ch (rsge1.iprolink.ch [194.41.63.1])
by ns1.vrx.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83B7CF022
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 27 Jun 1999 05:17:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from josmarian.ch (ip88.gex.pub-ip.fr.psi.net [154.15.22.88])
by mail.iprolink.ch (ipl/ipl) with ESMTP id FAA28554
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 27 Jun 1999 05:24:23 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 00:50:33 +0200
From: Mark Measday <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: Josmarian SA
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IFWP] regular exprssion of the general assembly of thednso
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
It might be interesting to speculate how many of the original subscribers to dnso
lists were deleted. It appears there were a number. As such it is likely that
there will always be a requirement for other lists to carry their quotient of
necessary news and views denied those in the more 'ordered' environment.
Unfortunate.
MM
"Richard J. Sexton" wrote:
> At 02:35 PM 6/26/99 -0400, Ken Stubbs wrote:
> >frankly.....
> >i dont believe that any truly public list like should be moderated with
> >exception of the the normal caveats for advocacy of violence, religious &
> >ethnic slurs etc.
> >we all have filters and if anyone gets sick and tired of reading someone's
> >postings then they can filter them out on their own mail clients
> >
> >ken stubbs
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: Gene Marsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Saturday, June 26, 1999 1:26 PM
> >Subject: Re: [IFWP] regular exprssion of the general assembly of the dnso
> >
> >
> >Removal from any public discussion list is a touchy subject. Perhaps, if
> >you are to implement such a policy, it should be with the review of two or
> >more individuals so as to avoid any accusation of personal vendetta.
>
> Agreed. I can't imagine any being actually stupid enought to eject
> somebody, but I like giving people enough rope to hang themselevs :-)
>
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "They were of a mind to govern us and we were of a mind to govern ourselves."
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"They were of a mind to govern us and we were of a mind to govern ourselves."
