On Fri, 02 Jul 1999 00:34:29 -0400, "Frank J. Fenello"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Ms. Kleiman,
>
>The results of a biased process can't possibly
>be acceptable to those who view ICANN as the
>first step in the establishment of Internet
>Governance.
>
>The Personal Domain Name Holders Association
>formally objects to this bogus "consensus"
>document.
>
>Michael Sondow, one of the first organizers
>of this constituency, has been designated as
>our representative in this process. He has
>been arbitrarily excluded from this "newest
>draft," contrary to the stated goals of the
>White Paper.
>
>Until Michael Sondow agrees that you have
>a consensus document, you don't.
>
Mr Sondow would never agree to any document which did not raise him to
some position of power where he has the ultimate say.
Your position that until Mr Sondow agrees to a document it is not
consensus is as unacceptable as their proposal.
Being one of the first people to say they want to help form a
constituency conveys absolutely no rights or privileges to that
person.
--
William X. Walsh
General Manager, DSo Internet Services
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax:(209) 671-7934
"The fact is that domain names are new and have unique
characteristics, and their status under the law is not yet clear."
--Kent Crispin (June 29th, 1999)
