Kerry Miller wrote:
> Since whether a 'technical' structure can swing that seems to be
> a very dubious proposition, the central argument for ICANNs
> existence is thus demolished: shouldnt the whole 'experiment'
> therefore be handed back to the folks who set it up?
Assuming, of course, that they want to run it. However, I would not
expect that many of them want to touch issues of naming policy. You
can check the namedroppers archives, in which Postel and others
deliberately stayed away from naming policy in the original DNS
conception.
--gregbo
