Wasn't me, but it sure was a good laugh.
On Wed, 07 Jul 1999 12:46:19 +0100, Jeff Williams
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Meredith and all,
>
> Yes, sadly it does seem that there are folks that like to play games
>on mailing lists. The REAL Brian C. Hollingsworth has not doubt
>forwarded this on to the proper authorities by now. <sigh>
>
>Meredith Tupper wrote:
>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Subject: Returned mail: Service unavailable
>> Date: Wed, 7 Jul 1999 14:09:09 -0400 (EDT)
>> From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> The original message was received at Wed, 7 Jul 1999 14:09:03 -0400 (EDT)
>> from dt132ne9.tampabay.rr.com [24.92.191.233]
>>
>> ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> ----- Transcript of session follows -----
>> ... while talking to lawsmtp3.prontomail.com.:
>> >>> RCPT To:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> <<< 552 RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mailbox disk quota exceeded
>> 554 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Service unavailable
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Reporting-MTA: dns; ns1.worldfax.com
>> Received-From-MTA: DNS; dt132ne9.tampabay.rr.com
>> Arrival-Date: Wed, 7 Jul 1999 14:09:03 -0400 (EDT)
>>
>> Final-Recipient: RFC822; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Action: failed
>> Status: 5.5.0
>> Remote-MTA: DNS; lawsmtp3.prontomail.com
>> Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 552 RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mailbox disk quota
>exceeded
>> Last-Attempt-Date: Wed, 7 Jul 1999 14:09:08 -0400 (EDT)
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Subject: Re: ICANN Stealth appointment?
>> Date: Wed, 07 Jul 1999 14:05:21 -0400
>> From: Meredith Tupper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Organization: PintSize Graphics & Web Hosting, Inc.
>> To: "Dr. Brian C. Hollingsworth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> The alleged Dr. Brian C. Hollingsworth, doctor of BS, imparted this wisdom:
>>
>> > I have been warned through several emails that there is a dedicated group of
>people whose sole goal in this process is one of disruption. As I stated earlier, I
>do have an "open door" policy, but frankly, that policy does not extend to those
>participants whose sole reason for being here is juvenile posturing and an inflated
>sense of self importance.
>> >
>> > I have much more important things to do with my time than sink myself into the
>miasma of nonsense that has constituted the majority of these discussions.
>>
>> Then get back to work. Jeff, it's Baker Act time for you. You are so transparent,
>even a kid could see what's going on here. If you're so busy, why are you wasting
>precious time replying to this "nonsense" list? Don't you have any assistants to
>screen your mail, like real "sr. legal advisors" do? Why do all your fictitious
>titles have to be senior?
>> And a free e-mail address? And still no url. At least you used a spell checker
>this time.
>>
>> Tip: if you want to convince us that you really are part of ICANN, you would start
>by ignoring us. Please fabricate a new identity and try harder next time, or else
>knock it off.
>>
>> Meredith
>>
>> --
>> PintSize Graphics and Web Hosting, Inc.
>> http://www.pintsize.com/
>>
>> "Don't make me come down there."
>> -- God
>
>Regards,
--
William X. Walsh
General Manager, DSo Internet Services
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax:(209) 671-7934
"The fact is that domain names are new and have unique
characteristics, and their status under the law is not yet clear."
--Kent Crispin (June 29th, 1999)
