[line eater food]
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Hi, IFWPers.
>>
>>This mail will bounce, as I am unable to get the subscription to the IFWP
>>list with my new address.
>>
>>I first asked Richard Sexton to change my address, and he referred me to
>>instructions at the Web site http://www.open-rsc.org/ - please note that to
Maybe you asked about the ORSC list ? Maybe I gave you the wrong URL ?
Who knows, but ant any rate I'm sorry for any cnofusion Robert.
For reference:
ORSC List subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.open-rsc.org/lists/
IFWP List subscribe/unsubscribe: http://lists.ifwp.org/
As for
>>address a mail to Richard is already a non-straightforward task for the 99%
>>"minority" who refers to the root system as authoritative ;>)
Unless, of course, you read the signature file on the bottom of each message:
>--
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Let me know if you can't resolve this. Oh, and ^C is "cut" and ^V is "paste" :-)
>>I followed instructions at the site (http://www.open-rsc.org/lists/others/),
>>and asked people at my former site to unsubscribe my old address, while I
>>subscribed my new one.
>>
>>In fact, after a couple of days ("Gee, isn't the list silent!"), I realized
>>that the thing did not work. The postmaster at ETSI told me that my mailbox,
>>that is still active for administrative reasons, is flooded with IFWP
>>messages, while I did not get any.
>>So, we did everything once again. But, surprise!, the system did not do it,
>>because it claimed it was already done.
Ah yes. That is a problem. That page was set up a long time ago whe Andy
was running the IFWP list and apparantly I've forgotten all about it. I'll
fix it right now, but please understand I can't fix what I don't know is
broken.
>>So, last resort, the E-Mail address on the Web site for "problems &
>>suggestions", [EMAIL PROTECTED] In fact, it is Andy Sernowitz' E-mail,
>>and he kindly answered that he is not managing this since a year ago.
Thats correct.
>>I think that this, while it is just a minor incident (maybe in my getting
>>settled in the new job, city and country I would not have had time anyhow to
>>go through my mail), it is interesting in relationship with the proposal
>>that comes in waves about the IFWP list as the voting body of the Internet,
>>and/or the candidate "unique" list for all Internet issues, and so on. If we
>>cannot change a subscriber's address, can we be trusted in checking voting
>>rights of participants?
That's a but of a stretch, Robest, IMHO.
>>The cc: to the dnso list has two purposes: first to ask some DNSOer to
>>forward this message to the IFWP, and second to acknowledge that the same
>>operation on the DNSO lists worked the first time through.
>>
>>
>>Regards
>>Roberto
>>
>>P.S.: Please note that my new address is [EMAIL PROTECTED], effective
>>1999-07-01. This is only temporary, because I will move to a personal
>>address soon.
Follow the bouncing Bob :-) Roberto, just send me mail and I'll update your
subscription immediatley. I'm not quite sure what it should be right now,
so drop me a line. Oh, and don't worry, you havn't really missed anything.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"They were of a mind to govern us and we were of a mind to govern ourselves."
