I agree. I was pointed here by a post by Ellen, but had to guess that a SUBSCRIBE message would work. It did, but it was only by guessing. -Nathan James ---------- >From: Jay Fenello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [IFWP] BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Non-member submission from [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Admin request of type /\bchange\b.*\baddress\b/ at line 6 >Date: Thu, Jul 8, 1999, 10:24 AM > > > > FWIW, I agree with Roberto. > > We need to make it easier for people > to find and subscribe to the IFWP list. > > At the very least, it should be listed > and easy to find on the IFWP web site. > > Jay. > > > At 01:02 PM 7/8/99 , Richard J. Sexton wrote: >>>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Non-member submission from > [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Admin request of type /\bchange\b.*\baddress\b/ at line 6 >>>Date: Thu, 8 Jul 1999 12:49:29 -0400 (EDT) >>> >>>>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 8 12:49:27 1999 >>>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>Received: from fw2.iaea.org (fortress.iaea.org [195.212.98.66]) >>> by ns1.vrx.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF696F01F >>> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 8 Jul 1999 12:49:26 -0400 (EDT) >>>Received: from sp1t2n03.iaea.or.at. (ns1.iaea.or.at [161.5.64.79]) >>> by fw2.iaea.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA19979 >>> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 8 Jul 1999 18:43:17 +0200 (METDST) >>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>Received: from iaea-m1.iaea.org (iaea-m1.iaea.or.at [161.5.68.240]) by > sp1t2n03.iaea.or.at. (AIX4.3/UCB 8.8.8/8.7) with ESMTP id SAA57912; Thu, 8 > Jul 1999 18:39:55 +0200 >>>Received: by iaea-m1.iaea.or.at with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) >>> id <N32S3ZG4>; Thu, 8 Jul 1999 18:42:56 +0200 >>>Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>Subject: IFWP list and Internet Governance >>>Date: Thu, 8 Jul 1999 18:41:29 +0200 >>>MIME-Version: 1.0 >>>X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) >>>Content-Type: text/plain >>> >>>Hi, IFWPers. >>> >>>This mail will bounce, as I am unable to get the subscription to the IFWP >>>list with my new address. >>> >>>I first asked Richard Sexton to change my address, and he referred me to >>>instructions at the Web site http://www.open-rsc.org/ - please note that to >>>address a mail to Richard is already a non-straightforward task for the 99% >>>"minority" who refers to the root system as authoritative ;>) >>> >>>I followed instructions at the site (http://www.open-rsc.org/lists/others/), >>>and asked people at my former site to unsubscribe my old address, while I >>>subscribed my new one. >>> >>>In fact, after a couple of days ("Gee, isn't the list silent!"), I realized >>>that the thing did not work. The postmaster at ETSI told me that my mailbox, >>>that is still active for administrative reasons, is flooded with IFWP >>>messages, while I did not get any. >>>So, we did everything once again. But, surprise!, the system did not do it, >>>because it claimed it was already done. >>> >>>So, last resort, the E-Mail address on the Web site for "problems & >>>suggestions", [EMAIL PROTECTED] In fact, it is Andy Sernowitz' E-mail, >>>and he kindly answered that he is not managing this since a year ago. >>> >>>I think that this, while it is just a minor incident (maybe in my getting >>>settled in the new job, city and country I would not have had time anyhow to >>>go through my mail), it is interesting in relationship with the proposal >>>that comes in waves about the IFWP list as the voting body of the Internet, >>>and/or the candidate "unique" list for all Internet issues, and so on. If we >>>cannot change a subscriber's address, can we be trusted in checking voting > >>>rights of participants? >>> >>>The cc: to the dnso list has two purposes: first to ask some DNSOer to >>>forward this message to the IFWP, and second to acknowledge that the same >>>operation on the DNSO lists worked the first time through. >>> >>> >>>Regards >>>Roberto >>> >>>P.S.: Please note that my new address is [EMAIL PROTECTED], effective >>>1999-07-01. This is only temporary, because I will move to a personal >>>address soon. >>> >>> >>> >>-- >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>"They were of a mind to govern us and we were of a mind to govern ourselves." >> >
